Human heart

Can in silico models predict drug-induced cardiac risk in vulnerable populations?

By Paula Dominguez-Gomez et al.

This study evaluates virtual cardiac populations for preclinical assessment of drug-induced QT interval prolongation and arrhythmic risk. A virtual cohort of subjects across healthy and diseased hearts was generated using computational models of realistic heart anatomies and electrophysiology. They then assessed QT prolongation and arrhythmic events following drug administration.

Click here to learn more >
Non-human primate

Retrospective evaluation of the use of non-human primates for fertility assessment of pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing approval in the EU.

By Puck Roos et al.

The authors evaluated fertility assessment in non-human primates for human pharmaceuticals. They found that non-human primate data were not vital for fertility risk assessment : For small molecules, rodent data provided sufficient information; for biologicals, effects were related to their mechanism of action. no clear scientific value of fertility assessment in sexually mature NHP was determined.

Click here to learn more >

Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products

By the FDA

This guidance provides recommendations to sponsors and other interested parties on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to produce information or data intended to support regulatory decision-making regarding safety, effectiveness, or quality for drugs. Specifically, this guidance provides a risk-based credibility assessment framework that may be used for establishing and evaluating the credibility of an AI model for a particular context of use (COU).

Click here to learn more >
Pregnant

ICH E21 Guideline on inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding individuals in clinical trials

By the MEA

The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations for the appropriate inclusion and/or retention of pregnant and/or breastfeeding individuals in clinical trials and facilitate the generation of robust clinical data that allow for evidence-based decision making on the safe and effective use of medicinal products by these individuals and their healthcare providers (HCPs).

Click here to learn more >

Incorporating new approach methodologies in the development of new medicines

By the NC3Rs and the MHRA

To explore how New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) can be more effectively integrated into medicines development, the NC3Rs, MHRA and ABPI convened a cross-sector workshop with experts from regulatory agencies, industry and academia. Discussions focused on identifying where NAMs are currently being used, the scientific and regulatory challenges to broader adoption, and practical steps that could support progress.

Click here to learn more >
U.S. Food and Drug Administration

FDA Moves to Limit Certain Long-Term Non-Human Primate Studies

By Soumya Shashikumar

The FDA has released draft guidance outlining when six-month toxicity studies in non-human primates may be reduced or eliminated for certain monoclonal antibody programs. The update shifts how the agency evaluates nonclinical safety packages for biologics, placing greater emphasis on human-relevant data rather than default long-duration primate studies.

Click here to learn more >

Sponsor Responsibilities – Safety Reporting Requirements and Safety Assessment for IND and Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Studies

By the FDA

The guidance provides recommendations for sponsors and sponsor-investigators to comply with the requirements of investigational new drug application (IND) safety reporting and safety reporting for bioavailability (BA) and bioequivalence (BE) studies. It also provides interpretations of terms used for safety reporting, makes recommendations on when and how to submit a safety report, and provides information on other safety reporting issues raised by sponsors.

Click here to learn more >

Cleaning the scientific house: Rebuilding trust in science requires confronting the harms of ghostwriting

By Naomi Oreskes

In this article, the author explains how ghost-writing in science threatens the integrity of scientific research. She takes the example of a paper about the safety of the pesticide glyphosate that happened to be written by Monsanto employees, and that is cited as a “reliable and credible source” proving that glyphosate is non-carcinogenic in many academic papers and government documents.

Click here to learn more >
Study sex differences

Study of Sex Differences in the Clinical Evaluation of Medical Products

By the FDA

This guidance provides recommendations for increasing enrollment of female participants in clinical trials and non-interventional studies to help ensure the generalizability of results, analyzing and interpreting sex-specific data, and including sex-specific information in regulatory submissions of medical products. The general principles outlined in this guidance also apply to increasing enrollment of male participants in clinical trials if underrepresented.

Click here to learn more >